Troubleshooting Introduction Lab¶
This is a simple lab to introduce you to some basic troubleshooting. The answer to the questions are collapsed below.
Preparing The Lab¶
- Log into the LabAccess jumpserver:
- Type
labs
or97
at the Main Menu prompt to access additional labs. - Type
troubleshooting-labs
or option 4 at this prompt to open the troubleshooting lab section (If you were previously in the Troubleshooting Labs Menu, you can type back or option 97 to go back). - Type
tshoot-intro
or option 1 at the prompt. The script will configure the lab into a errored set of states. It is up to you to determine a solution for each of the questions below. There can be many solutions, please work with your SE if something isn't clear.
- Type
Questions¶
-
Why can’t s1-Leaf1 ping s1-Host1? Are there multiple ways to fix this?
Possible Solution for Question 1
Host1
interface e3 is set as a trunk port that only allows VLAN 12.Leaf1
is taggingLeaf1
interface e5 traffic with VLAN 12, hence the packet is 802.1Q-tagged with VLAN 12 on egress.Host1
interface e3 must match VLAN 12. You will need to move the SVI IP (incorrectly assigned to VLAN 22) to VLAN 12 onHost1
, and also create VLAN 12 onHost1
. The IP address on this SVI is also a clue to the fact that it belonged to VLAN 12: 172.16.112.201/24. -
Why is s1-Leaf2 the spanning tree root for all VLANs?
Possible Solution for Question 2
Because
Leaf2
has a lower (aka. better) STP priority across all VLANs. It’s manually set to 4096 as part of the Bridge ID. -
Why isn’t 172.16.112.0/24 being advertised into BGP?
Possible Solution for Question 3
Because the subnet mask on the “network” statement on Leaf1 has a subnet mask (“/25”) that does not match the interface subnet mask (“/24”).
Bonus Question 1: Why is Leaf2 not showing up as a BGP peer?
Bonus 1 Answer
Leaf2
is not showing up as a BGP peer because BGP is not configured onLeaf2
- there’s just a VLAN extension and trunk betweenLeaf1
andLeaf2
.Bonus Question 2: Can Spine1 ping Host1, why or why not?
Bonus 2 Answer
The ping fails because `Host1` does not have a route back to `Spine1` (`Spine1` interface e2 = 172.16.200.1 or `Spine1` interface lo0 = 172.16.0.1)
-
Why won’t the OSPF adjacency come up between Leaf1 & Spine1?
Possible Solution for Question 4
There is an MTU mismatch on the point-to-point link between
Spine1
interface e2 andLeaf1
interface e2.-
Bonus Question 1: Which routing protocol prevails in the FIB? Why?
Bonus 1 Answer
OSPF prevails because its administrative distance is the least (110).
-